Framework

Judgment Before Automation

JBA is the umbrella framework. Human-in-the-Middle (HITM) is the model. The MVP Lab is the flagship program.

Core Framework

A framework for responsible, human-centered AI building.

AI increases speed. Judgment must increase first. Judgment Before Automation is not anti-AI. It is an architectural stance against irresponsible automation.

Framework JBA
Model HITM
Flagship Program MVP Lab
Tone Calm, grounded

Core Thesis

Automation without architecture creates fragility.

AI systems can generate code, text, and structure at unprecedented speed. What they cannot generate is responsibility. JBA argues that speed must be structured and humans remain accountable.

Judgment Before Automation argues:

  • Speed must be structured
  • Automation must be bounded
  • Architecture must precede execution
  • Humans remain accountable

This is not anti-AI. It is anti-irresponsibility.

The Dialectic

A third position between automation maximalism and automation rejection.

AI discourse often polarizes into “let it generate everything” or “reject it entirely.” JBA proposes structured, human-led use with clear boundaries and approval.

Extreme 1: Automation maximalism

  • Let it generate everything
  • Trust outputs by default
  • Retrofit structure later

Extreme 2: Automation rejection

  • AI destroys craft
  • Avoid assisted workflows completely
  • Lose leverage and speed

JBA proposes a third position: use AI fully, but under human-defined structure and approval.

The Model: Human-in-the-Middle

HITM is the operational implementation of the framework.

Human-in-the-Middle is not reactive oversight. It is structural authority. The human defines boundaries before output exists, then approves what ships.

Core principle

  • Research is human
  • Structure is human
  • AI executes stepwise
  • Nothing ships without review

HITM vs Human-in-the-Loop

  • Human-in-the-loop reacts to output
  • Human-in-the-middle defines boundaries first
  • HITM preserves structural authority

Learn more about the Human-in-the-Middle model →

Applications

Where JBA applies

  • MVP development
  • Product architecture
  • Repository discipline
  • Asset pipelines
  • AI-assisted design workflows
  • Funding-ready packaging

Not a Prompt Technique

A systems approach

Judgment Before Automation is a way of organizing human authority, technical boundaries, and execution discipline. Prompts are tools inside that structure, not the structure itself.

Proof

This framework is applied in real-world builds.

CO2Calc is a structured emissions workflow MVP built using Human-in-the-Middle Architecture. The frozen teaching snapshot and the live evolving version are both public.

Frozen teaching snapshot

CO2Calc Lab Version

Stable architecture state used for teaching and reference.

Open frozen version ↗

Live evolving version

CO2Calc (Current)

Ongoing development continues while the framework remains stable.

Open live version ↗

Flagship Program

The Human-in-the-Middle MVP Lab is the primary applied format of this framework.

Build an MVP in 5 days without losing architectural control. The MVP Lab is the high-commitment, full-system experience under the JBA framework.

Relationship to Context

Context asks the questions. JBA builds the structures that respond.

For deeper analysis of AI discourse, systemic bias, and broader questions, see Context. JBA focuses on applied architectural responses and responsible implementation.

Related site

context.schmidtpabst.com ↗

Subtle relationship, not a competing CTA.

Positioning

Judgment Before Automation is not a trend response. It is an architectural stance.

AI will accelerate. Judgment must scale with it. This page introduces the framework; the HITM page shows the model and the MVP Lab applies it.